Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.
Skip to main content

Lay Perspectives on Receiving Different Types of Genomic Secondary Findings: a Qualitative Vignette Study.

Journal article

Vornanen M. et al, (2019), Journal of genetic counseling, 28, 343 - 354

Lay perspectives on receiving different types of genomic secondary findings: a qualitative vignette study

Journal article

Vornanen M. et al, (2018), Journal of Genetic Counseling

High-Risk Women’s Risk Perception After Receiving Personalized Polygenic Breast Cancer Risk Information

Journal article

Forrest L. et al, (2018), Journal of Community Genetics

Big data phenotyping in rare diseases: some ethical issues.

Journal article

Hallowell N. et al, (2018), Genet Med

Making Sense of SNPs: Women's Understanding and Experiences of Receiving a Personalized Profile of Their Breast Cancer Risks.

Journal article

Young M-A. et al, (2018), Journal of genetic counseling, 27, 702 - 708

Research or clinical care: what's the difference?

Journal article

Hallowell N., (2018), Journal of medical ethics, 44, 359 - 360

High-risk individuals' perceptions of reproductive genetic testing for CDH1 mutations.

Journal article

Hallowell N. et al, (2017), Familial cancer, 16, 531 - 535

Primary care physicians' views about gatekeeping in clinical research recruitment: A qualitative study.

Journal article

Guillemin M. et al, (2017), AJOB empirical bioethics, 8, 99 - 105

Load More