Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Continue

Publications

Protection by exclusion? the (lack of) inclusion of adults who lack capacity to consent to research in clinical trials in the UK

Shepherd V. et al, (2019), Trials, 20

Should the Decisions of Institutional Review Boards Be Consistent?

Friesen P. et al, (2019), Ethics & human research, 41, 2 - 14

Research involving adults lacking capacity to consent: a content analysis of participant information sheets for consultees and legal representatives in England and Wales.

Shepherd V. et al, (2019), Trials, 20

Patient and public involvement: Two sides of the same coin or different coins altogether?

McCoy MS. et al, (2019), Bioethics

Structural Transformation to Attain Responsible BIOSciences (STARBIOS2): Protocol for a Horizon 2020 Funded European Multicenter Project to Promote Responsible Research and Innovation.

Colizzi V. et al, (2019), JMIR research protocols, 8

Exploring the ethics of global health research priority-setting.

Pratt B. et al, (2018), BMC medical ethics, 19

National Standards for Public Involvement in Research: missing the forest for the trees.

McCoy MS. et al, (2018), Journal of medical ethics, 44, 801 - 804

Ethical understandings of proxy decision making for research involving adults lacking capacity: A systematic review (framework synthesis) of empirical research.

Shepherd V. et al, (2018), AJOB empirical bioethics, 9, 267 - 286

In defence of governance: ethics review and social research.

Sheehan M. et al, (2018), Journal of medical ethics, 44, 710 - 716

Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley.

Sheehan M. et al, (2018), Journal of medical ethics, 44, 719 - 720

Healthcare professionals' understanding of the legislation governing research involving adults lacking mental capacity in England and Wales: a national survey.

Shepherd V. et al, (2018), Journal of medical ethics, 44, 632 - 637

Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensus.

Ives J. et al, (2018), BMC medical ethics, 19

The Family Context of Assent: Comparison of Child and Parent Perspectives on Familial Decision-Making

Sibley A. et al, (2017), Children & Society

The new Health Research Authority framework: still work to do to facilitate high-quality public health research in English local authorities.

Phipps E. et al, (2017), Perspectives in public health, 137, 262 - 265

Maximising value from a United Kingdom Biomedical Research Centre: study protocol.

Greenhalgh T. et al, (2017), Health research policy and systems, 15

Metaethics, relativism and empirical bioethics

Sheehan M., (2016), Empirical Bioethics: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, 33 - 50

Gene editing of human embryos and designing descendants.

Sheehan M., (2016), Maturitas, 94, 20 - 21

Just Wars and doctors' strikes.

Sheehan M., (2016), Journal of medical ethics, 42, 693 - 694

Variation in university research ethics review: Reflections following an inter-university study in England

Vadeboncoeur C. et al, (2016), Research Ethics, 12, 217 - 233

Expertise, Ethics Expertise, and Clinical Ethics Consultation: Achieving Terminological Clarity.

Iltis AS. and Sheehan M., (2016), The Journal of medicine and philosophy, 41, 416 - 433

Load More

Include forthcoming?