Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The research assessment exercise (RAE) forms the basis for determining the funding of higher education institutions in the UK. Monies are distributed according to a range of performance criteria, the most important of which is "research outputs". Problems to do with publication misconduct, and in particular, issues of justice in attributing authorship, are endemic within the research community. It is here argued that the research assessment exercise currently makes no explicit attempt to address these concerns, and indeed, by focusing attention on research outputs, may actually be fostering such ethical problems.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/jme.26.6.422

Type

Journal article

Journal

Journal of medical ethics

Publication Date

12/2000

Volume

26

Pages

422 - 426

Addresses

Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London.

Keywords

Humans, Research, Biomedical Research, Social Justice, Scientific Misconduct, Authorship, United Kingdom