Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BackgroundAnaphylaxis is an acute systemic allergic reaction, which can be life-threatening. H(1)-antihistamines are commonly used as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of anaphylaxis. We sought to assess the benefits and harm of H(1)-antihistamines in the treatment of anaphylaxis.MethodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library); MEDLINE (1966 to June 2006); EMBASE (1966 to June 2006); CINAHL (1982 to June 2006) and ISI Web of Science (1945 to July 2006). We also contacted pharmaceutical companies and international experts in anaphylaxis in an attempt to locate unpublished material. Randomized and quasi-randomized-controlled trials comparing H(1)-antihistamines with placebo or no intervention were eligible for inclusion. Two authors independently assessed articles for inclusion.ResultsWe found no studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria.ConclusionsBased on this review, we are unable to make any recommendations for clinical practice. Randomized-controlled trials are needed, although these are likely to prove challenging to design and execute.

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01435.x

Type

Journal article

Journal

Allergy

Publication Date

08/2007

Volume

62

Pages

830 - 837

Addresses

Division of Community Health Sciences: GP Section, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Keywords

Humans, Anaphylaxis, Histamine H1 Antagonists, Anti-Allergic Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Databases as Topic