Current regulations do not allow most low-risk research using patient records without patient consent. One of the main reasons adduced for this is that such research constitutes an unacceptable breach of confidentiality. By contrast, it is argued in this paper that it may, on occasion, be acceptable for confidentiality to be breached according to all three of the major ethical justifications for respecting patient confidentiality. In practice, the arguments against allowing research using patient records are usually grounded in claims about the link between confidentiality and respect for patient autonomy rather than legitimate patient expectations. Patients may have good reason to expect, or come to expect, that their records will be used without their consent for low-risk research, under certain conditions. Where this is the case, such expectations provide reasonable grounds for considering such research to be ethical.

Original publication

DOI

10.1258/1355819054338960

Type

Journal article

Journal

Journal of health services research & policy

Publication Date

07/2005

Volume

10

Pages

183 - 186

Addresses

The Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, Old Road, Oxford, UK. michael.parker@ethox.ac.uk

Keywords

Humans, Medical Records, Confidentiality, Informed Consent, Ethics, Research, State Medicine, United Kingdom