Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

A questionnaire-based research project enquiring into the psychological health of general practice managers found that 5% of managers admitted to suicidal ideas. This paper explores the moral issues raised when research conducted at a distance uncovers information about participants which indicates that they may be at increased risk of harm. It examines whether the authors of such studies have responsibilities towards their research participants beyond those of analysing and properly interpreting the data supplied to them. The paper is an exercise in self-reflection and self-criticism; not all the questions posed and explored by it can be answered definitively. Implications for planning studies of this kind are discussed.

Type

Journal article

Journal

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

Publication Date

01/2001

Volume

51

Pages

32 - 35

Addresses

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Imperial College School of Medicine, St Dunstan's Road, London W6 8RP. aziz.sheikh@ic.ac.uk

Keywords

Humans, Health Surveys, Depression, Suicide, Stress, Psychological, Anxiety, Mental Health, Confidentiality, Family Practice, Ethics, Medical, Administrative Personnel, Surveys and Questionnaires