Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

A variety of approaches are available to monitor and quantify the frequency of medical errors and the harm associated with them. The University HealthSystem Consortium Patient Safety Net provides a categorical, rank-ordered approach for designating harm associated with medical errors but does not lend itself to routine monitoring of change over time. A brief questionnaire was developed and given to hospital administrators to collect ratings about the harmfulness of events occurring in each of the 10 University HealthSystem Consortium harm-score categories. Results revealed a high degree of agreement among raters for harmfulness ratings for each category. A cubic model fit the data best and provided weights for each of the harm-score categories. This preliminary study proposes a methodology for quantifying harm scores.

Original publication

DOI

10.1097/qmh.0b013e3181fa074e

Type

Journal article

Journal

Quality management in health care

Publication Date

10/2010

Volume

19

Pages

298 - 303

Addresses

Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 67 President Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. madana@musc.edu

Keywords

Humans, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Safety Management, Hospitals, University, Medical Errors, Quality of Health Care