Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

PurposeBacterial eye infections are commonly treated with topical antibiotics, despite limited evidence of effectiveness. Azithromycin 1% in DuraSite((R)) is a new formulation of azithromycin in a gel polymer designed for use in acute bacterial conjunctivitis.MethodsWe conducted systematic searches of the Cochrane Database of Clinical Trials, PubMed and Google Scholar to find randomized controlled trials of "azithromycin DuraSite((R))". These searches of published literature were supplemented with searches for unpublished trials and trials in progress.ResultsWe found six reports of randomized controlled trials investigating the role of azithromycin 1% in DuraSite((R)) for the management of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. The quality of these trials was judged to be moderate to high. These trials assessed effectiveness, tolerability and safety outcomes, but we found no trials looking at cost-effectiveness. DuraSite((R)) is a relatively stable formulation and so azithromycin 1% in DuraSite((R)) has a simpler dosing schedule than other available topical antibiotics. It appears to be similar to other topical antibiotics in its effectiveness, but minor side effects are quite common.ConclusionAcute bacterial conjunctivitis is a relatively mild, typically self-limiting, infection. Antibiotics should seldom be required. If, however, a decision to prescribe antibiotics is made, azithromycin 1% in DuraSite((R)) is likely to be broadly comparable in its effectiveness to most other antibiotics used to treat acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Further research is needed to determine its cost-effectiveness.

Original publication

DOI

10.2147/ppa.s4203

Type

Journal article

Journal

Patient preference and adherence

Publication Date

05/2010

Volume

4

Pages

69 - 76

Addresses

Centre for Population Health Sciences: GP Section, Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, University of Edinburgh, Medical School, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.