Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

263 participants completing a randomised controlled trial comparing telephone vs. face-to-face asthma consultations were asked about preferences for future reviews. Qualitative analysis of data from 209 respondents identified divergent views. Clear opinions were expressed about the respective roles of the two modes of consulting; telephone consultations were considered convenient for reviewing 'well controlled' asthma, whereas face-to-face consultations were perceived as allowing in-depth assessment of problems in those with more symptomatic asthma. Practices may consider offering patients the choice of a telephone or face-to-face review.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.pcrj.2004.10.002

Type

Journal article

Journal

Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group

Publication Date

02/2005

Volume

14

Pages

42 - 46

Addresses

Division of Community Health Sciences: GP section, University of Edinburgh, 20, West Richmond St, Edinburgh, EH8 9DX, UK. hpinnock@gpiag-asthma.org