Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BackgroundConfidentiality is considered a cornerstone of the medical consultation. However, the telephone, previously used mainly to negotiate appointments, has become increasingly employed as a means of consultation and may pose new problems in respect to maintaining confidentiality.ObjectiveAs part of a qualitative investigation into the views of patients, doctors, nurses and administrative staff on the use of telephone consulting in general practice, we set out to explore the impact of the use of this medium on perceptions of confidentiality.MethodWe used focus groups of purposively selected patients, clinicians and administrative staff in urban and rural areas.ResultsFifteen focus groups comprising 91 individuals were convened. Participants concerns centred on overheard conversations, the receptionist role in triage, difficulty of maintaining confidentiality in small close-knit communities, errors in identification, third party conversations and answering machines. Telephone consulting, depending on the circumstances, could pose a risk or offer a solution to maintaining confidentiality.ConclusionsMany of the concerns that patients and health care staff have around confidentiality breaches both on the telephone and face to face are amenable to careful management. Although rare, identification error or fraud can be a potentially serious problem and further thought needs to be given to the problem of misidentification on the telephone and the use of passwords considered.

Original publication

DOI

10.1093/fampra/cmp032

Type

Journal article

Journal

Family practice

Publication Date

10/2009

Volume

26

Pages

344 - 350

Addresses

Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK. brian.mckinstry@ed.ac.uk

Keywords

Humans, Health Care Surveys, Focus Groups, Attitude, Physician-Patient Relations, Counseling, Confidentiality, Family Practice, Qualitative Research, Fraud, Telephone, Adult, Rural Population, Practice Management, Medical, Primary Health Care, Female, Male