Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

ObjectiveClinical trials involve the collection of a wealth of data, comprising multiple diverse measurements performed at baseline and follow-up visits over the course of a trial. The most common primary analysis is restricted to a single, potentially composite endpoint at one time point. While such an analytical focus promotes simple and replicable conclusions, it does not necessarily fully capture the multi-faceted effects of a drug in a complex disease setting. Therefore, to complement existing approaches, we set out here to design a longitudinal multivariate analytical framework that accepts as input an entire clinical trial database, comprising all measurements, patients, and time points across multiple trials.MethodsOur framework composes probabilistic principal component analysis with a longitudinal linear mixed effects model, thereby enabling clinical interpretation of multivariate results, while handling data missing at random, and incorporating covariates and covariance structure in a computationally efficient and principled way.ResultsWe illustrate our approach by applying it to four phase III clinical trials of secukinumab in Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). We identify three clinically plausible latent factors that collectively explain 74.5% of empirical variation in the longitudinal patient database. We estimate longitudinal trajectories of these factors, thereby enabling joint characterisation of disease progression and drug effect. We perform benchmarking experiments demonstrating our method's competitive performance at estimating average treatment effects compared to existing statistical and machine learning methods, and showing that our modular approach leads to relatively computationally efficient model fitting.ConclusionOur multivariate longitudinal framework has the potential to illuminate the properties of existing composite endpoint methods, and to enable the development of novel clinical endpoints that provide enhanced and complementary perspectives on treatment response.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104641

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

154

Addresses

D, e, p, a, r, t, m, e, n, t, , o, f, , S, t, a, t, i, s, t, i, c, s, ,, , U, n, i, v, e, r, s, i, t, y, , o, f, , O, x, f, o, r, d, ,, , U, K, ;, , T, h, e, , A, l, a, n, , T, u, r, i, n, g, , I, n, s, t, i, t, u, t, e, ,, , L, o, n, d, o, n, ,, , U, K, .

Keywords

Humans, Arthritis, Psoriatic, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Treatment Outcome, Models, Statistical, Longitudinal Studies, Principal Component Analysis, Clinical Trials as Topic, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized