Clinical geneticists are increasingly confronted with ethical tensions between their responsibilities to individual patients and to other family members. This paper considers the ethical implications of a "familial" conception of the clinical genetics role. It argues that dogmatic adherence to either the familial or to the individualistic conception of clinical genetics has the potential to lead to significant harms and to fail to take important obligations seriously. Geneticists are likely to continue to be required to make moral judgments in the resolution of such tensions and may find it useful to have access to ethics training and support.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/jme.29.2.70

Type

Journal article

Journal

Journal of medical ethics

Publication Date

04/2003

Volume

29

Pages

70 - 73

Addresses

Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. michael.parker@ethox.ox.ac.uk

Keywords

Humans, Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne, Family, Interpersonal Relations, Professional-Family Relations, Confidentiality, Genetics, Medical, Genetic Services, Heterozygote, Moral Obligations, Female, Male