Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The Thailand Major Overseas Programme coordinates large multi-center studies in tropical medicine and generates vast amounts of data. As the data sharing movement gains momentum, we wanted to understand attitudes and experiences of relevant stakeholders about what constitutes good data sharing practice. We conducted 15 interviews and three focus groups discussions involving 25 participants and found that they generally saw data sharing as something positive. Data sharing was viewed as a means to contribute to scientific progress and lead to better quality analysis, better use of resources, greater accountability, and more outputs. However, there were also important reservations including potential harms to research participants, their communities, and the researchers themselves. Given these concerns, several areas for discussion were identified: data standardization, appropriate consent models, and governance.

Original publication

DOI

10.1177/1556264615592388

Type

Journal article

Journal

Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE

Publication Date

07/2015

Volume

10

Pages

278 - 289

Addresses

Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand University of Oxford, UK phaikyeong@tropmedres.ac.

Keywords

Humans, Data Collection, Focus Groups, Attitude, Information Dissemination, Cooperative Behavior, Perception, Residence Characteristics, Biomedical Research, Qualitative Research, Developing Countries, Social Responsibility, Research Personnel, Research Subjects, Thailand, Female, Male